Primitive accumulation and surplus population: A critique of capitalocentrism in Marxian theory

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Marx’s concept of primitive accumulation has traditionally been understood as pre-history to the emergence and eventual universalization of capital in the social formation. I argue, to the contrary, that “primitive accumulation” can be a theoretical category only in the presence of a theorized notion of an “outside” to capital. This “outside” of capital in a social formation is populated by a “surpluspopulation”- another concept that needs to be delinked from the capitalocentric notion of “reserve army of labour”. Once we recognize an ever-present non-capitalist “outside” in a social formation, primitive accumulation becomes central to dominance of capital over a social formation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhattacharya, R. (2019). Primitive accumulation and surplus population: A critique of capitalocentrism in Marxian theory. In “Capital” in the East: Reflections on Marx (pp. 137–152). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9468-4_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free