Selecting the N-top retrieval result lists for an effective data fusion

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although the application of data fusion in information retrieval has yielded good results in the majority of the cases, it has been noticed that its achievement is dependent on the quality of the input result lists. In order to tackle this problem, in this paper we explore the combination of only the n-top result lists as an alternative to the fusion of all available data. In particular, we describe a heuristic measure based on redundancy and ranking information to evaluate the quality of each result list, and, consequently, to select the presumably n-best lists per query. Preliminary results in four IR test collections, containing a total of 266 queries, and employing three different DF methods are encouraging. They indicate that the proposed approach could significantly outperform the results achieved by fusion all available lists, showing improvements in mean average precision of 10.7%, 3.7% and 18.8% when it was used along with Maximum RSV, CombMNZ and Fuzzy Borda methods. © Springer-Verlag 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Juárez-González, A., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Pinto-Avendaño, D., & Pérez-Coutiño, M. (2010). Selecting the N-top retrieval result lists for an effective data fusion. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6008 LNCS, pp. 580–589). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_49

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free