Validating Safety Arguments with Lean

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Safety Assurance Cases (ACs) are structured arguments which demonstrate that a system fulfills its safety requirements. However, the reasoning used in ACs is often presented informally and thus difficult to rigorously evaluate. To protect against the acceptance of ACs based on fallacious reasoning, our previous work has proposed a framework for formalizing fragments of ACs and verifying their reasoning using the Lean Theorem Prover. This work expands on the use of Lean to automatically validate fragments of ACs, identifies challenges faced by AC developers who wish the leverage theorem proving software, and demonstrates our approach to mitigating these challenges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, L., Viger, T., Sandro, A. D., Shahin, R., & Chechik, M. (2021). Validating Safety Arguments with Lean. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 13085 LNCS, pp. 23–43). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92124-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free