Health information systems training for a countrywide implementation in Uruguay.

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Health Information systems training is one of the bottlenecks in clinical systems implementation. In this article, a strategy to massively create and train interdisciplinary coordinating teams is described for a project in Uruguay at FEMI, a non-academic setting which includes 23 health care institutions across the country and a tertiary referral center in Montevideo. A series of educational activities were designed for the local coordinating teams. They included both onsite and online formats, site visits, integrated with some of the project tasks. In total, 128 professionals from all the Institutions participated in one or more of the training sessions (onsite and online) and 87 of them accomplished one of the forms of training. Massive basic health informatics training was possible in Uruguay through collaboration with academic institutions at the country and regional level. Next steps include an active involvement of nurses in the educational events and planning of massive training of end users.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Strengthening global health informatics research within the andean region through international collaboration

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

10×10 comes full circle: Spanish version back to United States in Puerto Rico

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Making distance learning an effective health information systems training strategy: A combined social network analysis and content analysis perspective

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Margolis, A., Vero, A., Bessonart, L., Barbiel, A., & Ferla, M. (2009). Health information systems training for a countrywide implementation in Uruguay. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1638655

Readers over time

‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘19‘21‘2200.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Researcher 4

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

20%

Computer Science 2

20%

Psychology 2

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0