Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada

78Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Biodiversity assessment is an important part of conservation management that ideally can be accomplished with noninvasive methods without influencing the structure and functioning of ecosystems. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has provided a promising tool to enable fast and comprehensive monitoring of entire ecosystems, but widespread adoption of this technique requires performance evaluations that compare it with conventional surveys. We compared eDNA metabarcoding and trawling data to evaluate their efficiency to characterize demersal fish communities in the Estuary and Gulf of Saint-Lawrence, Canada. Seawater and bottom trawling samples were collected in parallel at 84 stations. For a subset of 30 of these stations, water was also collected at three different depths (15, 50, and 250 m) across the water column. An eDNA metabarcoding assay based on the 12S mitochondrial gene using the MiFish-U primers was applied to detect fish eDNA. We detected a total of 88 fish species with both methods combined, with 72 species being detected by eDNA, 64 species detected by trawl, and 47 species (53%) overlapped between both methods. eDNA was more efficient for quantifying species richness, mainly because it detected species known to be less vulnerable to trawling gear. Our results indicated that the relative abundance estimated by eDNA and trawl is significantly correlated for species detected by both methods, while the relationship was also influenced by environmental variables (temperature, depth, salinity, and oxygen). Integrating eDNA metabarcoding to bottom trawling surveys could provide additional information on vertical fish distribution in the water column. Environmental DNA metabarcoding thus appears to be a reliable and complementary approach to trawling surveys for documenting fish biodiversity, including for obtaining relative quantitative estimates in the marine environment.

References Powered by Scopus

Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data

15629Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models

14573Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics

8062Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

MiFish metabarcoding: a high-throughput approach for simultaneous detection of multiple fish species from environmental DNA and other samples

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Afzali, S. F., Bourdages, H., Laporte, M., Mérot, C., Normandeau, E., Audet, C., & Bernatchez, L. (2021). Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Environmental DNA, 3(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.111

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

64%

Researcher 21

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37

49%

Environmental Science 22

29%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 13

17%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 42

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0