A multi-dimensional comparison of ontology design patterns for representing n-ary relations

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Within the broad area of knowledge pattern science, an important topic is the discovery, description, and evaluation of modeling patterns for a certain task. One of the most controversial problem is constituted by modeling relations with large or variable (polymorphic) arity. There is indeed a large literature on representing n-ary relations in logical languages with expressivity limited to unary and binary relations, e.g. when time, space, roles and other knowledge should be used as indexes to binary relations. In this paper we provide a comparison of several design patterns, based on their respective (dis)advantages, as well as on their axiomatic complexity. Data on actual processing time for queries and DL reasoning from an in-vitro study is also provided. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gangemi, A., & Presutti, V. (2013). A multi-dimensional comparison of ontology design patterns for representing n-ary relations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7741 LNCS, pp. 86–105). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35843-2_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free