It is sometimes argued that employability is difficult or even impossible to define. Tymon (2013: 842), for example, states that definitions of employability are problematic and suffer from ‘a lack of coherence’. Chertkovskaya et al. (2013: 707) go further and argue that employability is ‘empty of any substantive meaning’. Whilst there are some merits to these positions, I would like to suggest, in contrast, that employability is rather too full of meaning; indeed, it can hardly bear the weight of the emotional and rhetorical investments made in it. This position is informed by the use of selected key concepts from depth psychology. Through this, I develop critical and creative responses to questions such as: What are the grand narratives of employability? How might they be de-centred and de-potentiated? What action can be taken as a result? Linked to this, practical examples are provided and actions identified. Although the context identified is drawn from higher education, the implications extend to all educational, community and workplace contexts.
CITATION STYLE
McCash, P. (2017). Employability and Depth Psychology. In Graduate Employability in Context (pp. 151–170). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57168-7_7
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.