HORIZONS: Acclimation, adaptation, traits and trade-offs in plankton functional type models: Reconciling terminology for biology and modelling

27Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We propose definitions in terminology to enhance ongoing collaborations between biologists and modellers on plankton ecology. Organism "functional type" should refer to commonality in ecology not biogeochemistry; the latter is largely an emergent property of the former, while alignment with ecology is also consistent with usage in terrestrial science. Adaptation should be confined, as in genetics, to consideration of species inter-generational change; most so-called "adaptive" plankton models are thus acclimative, modifying vital rates in response to stimuli. Trait trade-off approaches should ideally only be considered for describing intra-generational interactions; in applications between generations, and certainly between unrelated species, such concepts should be avoided. We suggest that systems biology approaches, through to complex adaptive/acclimative systems modelling, with explicit modelling of feedback processes (which we suggest should define "mechanistic" models), would provide realistic and flexible bases upon which to develop descriptions of functional type models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flynn, K. J., St John, M., Raven, J. A., Skibinski, D. O. F., Allen, J. I., Mitra, A., & Hofmann, E. E. (2015). HORIZONS: Acclimation, adaptation, traits and trade-offs in plankton functional type models: Reconciling terminology for biology and modelling. Journal of Plankton Research, 37(4), 683–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbv036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free