Numeracy across grades–vertically scaling the Norwegian national numeracy tests

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Enabling comparable scores across grades is of interest for policymakers to evaluate educational systems, for researchers to investigate substantive questions, and for teachers to infer student growth. This study implemented a vertical scaling design to numeracy tests given in grades 5 and 8 as part of the Norwegian national testing system. Our design bridges the gap between grades 5 and 8 with a linking test tailored for grades 6 and 7, without the need for new item development. The design combines the existing administration for all grade 5 and 8 students with additional tests for samples of grade 6 and 7 students. The findings indicate that vertically scaling existing tests is possible through a cost-effective design and that numeracy, as measured by the Norwegian national tests, is comparable across four grades. We discuss the implications of our study for creating vertical scales in the context of national assessment systems.

References Powered by Scopus

Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment

1845Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices

1118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Test theory: A unified treatment

628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Current controversies in educational assessment

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Effect of the Ratio of Common Items and the Separation of Grade Distributions on the Precision of Vertical Scaling

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ræder, H. G., Andersson, B., & Olsen, R. V. (2022). Numeracy across grades–vertically scaling the Norwegian national numeracy tests. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 29(6), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2147483

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 1

33%

Engineering 1

33%

Social Sciences 1

33%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free