The Power of Self-Directed Learning

0Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper studies self-directed learning, a variant of the on-line (or incremental) learning model in which the learner selects the presentation order for the instances. Alternatively, one can view this model as a variation of learning with membership queries in which the learner is only "charged" for membership queries for which it could not predict the outcome. We give tight bounds on the complexity of self-directed learning for the concept classes of monomials, monotone DNF formulas, and axis-parallel rectangles in {0,1, · · ·, n-l}d. These results demonstrate that the number of mistakes under self-directed learning can be surprisingly small. We then show that learning complexity in the model of self-directed learning is less than that of all other commonly studied on-line and query learning models. Next we explore the relationship between the complexity of self-directed learning and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension. We show that in general, the VC-Dimension and the self-directed learning complexity are incomparable. However, for some special cases we show that the VC-dimension gives a lower bound for the self-directed learning complexity. Finally, we explore a relationship between Mitchell's version space algorithm and the existence of self-directed learning algorithms that make few mistakes.

References Powered by Scopus

A theory of the learnable

3697Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Queries and Concept Learning

1556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension

1320Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldman, S. A., & Sloan, R. H. (1993). The Power of Self-Directed Learning. In AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report (Vol. SS-93-06, pp. 2–15). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00993977

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Researcher 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 21

78%

Social Sciences 3

11%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

7%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0