Development of a high-throughput screening method for LIM kinase 1 using a luciferase-based assay of ATP consumption

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Kinases are attractive drug targets because of the central roles they play in signal transduction pathways and human diseases. Their well-formed adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding pockets make ideal targets for small-molecule inhibitors. For drug discovery purposes, many peptide-based kinase assays have been developed that measure substrate phosphorylation using fluorescence-based readouts. However, for some kinases these assays may not be appropriate. In the case of the LIM kinases (LIMK), an inability to phosphorylate peptide substrates resulted in previous high-throughput screens (HTS) using radioactive labeling of recombinant cofilin protein as the readout. We describe the development of an HTS-compatible assay that measures relative ATP levels using luciferase-generated luminescence as a function of LIMK activity. The assay was inexpensive to perform, and proof-of-principle screening of kinase inhibitors demonstrated that compound potency against LIMK could be determined; ultimately, the assay was used for successful prosecution of automated HTS. Following HTS, the secondary assay format was changed to obtain more accurate measures of potency and mechanism of action using more complex (and expensive) assays. The luciferase assay nonetheless provides an inexpensive and reliable primary assay for HTS that allowed for the identification of LIMK inhibitors to initiate discovery programs for the eventual treatment of human diseases. © 2012 Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mezna, M., Wong, A. C., Ainger, M., Scott, R. W., Hammonds, T., & Olson, M. F. (2012). Development of a high-throughput screening method for LIM kinase 1 using a luciferase-based assay of ATP consumption. Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 17(4), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057111430529

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free