Hypertension-based clinical risk strategies for detecting microalbuminuria in diabetes

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Microalbuminuria screening to identify patients at risk of diabetic nephropathy is widely accepted. Aim: To investigate whether blood-pressure-based strategies can identify such patients without the need for microalbuminuria testing. Methods: Spot urine for albumin/creatinine ratios was performed in all patients over an 18-month period. The performance of four combinations of clinical models, based on existing triggers for antihypertensive intervention (prior use and/or existing systolic BP exceeding 140 or 160 mmHg and/or dipstick proteinuria exceeding 1+ or 2+) was evaluated at microalbuminuria thresholds of 3.5 and 10 mg/mmol. The models were ranked 1 to 4, based on their escalating relative strengths in predicting need for intervention. Results: Of 3748 patients, 1257 (34%) or 739 (20%) exceeded microalbuminuria thresholds of 3.5 or 10 mg/mmol. All four models predicted microalbuminuria risk (areas under ROC curves 0.60-0.77, all p < 0.001). The models (1-4) identified 2220, 2465, 2803 or 2937 for intervention, respectively, irrespective of microalbuminuria status, and missed 368, 232, 194 or 126 at 3.5 mg/mmol and 164, 87, 81 or 45 at 10 mg/mmol. Discussion: Clinical models using routinely measured parameters reduced the target population for microalbuminuria screening by 60-80%, missing 3-10% of patients with albumin/creatinine ratios exceeding 3.5 mg/mmol or 1-4% of those exceeding 10 mg/mmol. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baskar, V., Kamalakannan, D., Kiberd, B., Holland, M. R., & Singh, B. M. (2005). Hypertension-based clinical risk strategies for detecting microalbuminuria in diabetes. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 98(6), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hci066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free