The EPIC Kids Study: A randomized family-focused YMCA-based intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk youth

10Citations
Citations of this article
452Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: It is well established that behavioral lifestyle interventions resulting in modest weight reduction in adults can prevent or delay type 2 diabetes mellitus; however in children, successful weight management interventions are rarely found outside of controlled clinical settings. The lack of effective community-based programs is a barrier to reducing obesity prevalence and diabetes risk in children. The objective of our study is to develop and test a group-randomized family-centered community-based type 2 diabetes prevention intervention targeting at-risk children, 9- to 12-years-old. Methods/Design: Using participatory methods, the adult-focused YMCA Diabetes Prevention Program was adapted for families, creating a novel lifestyle behavior change program focused on healthy eating, physical activity, and a supportive home environment. The program will be tested in sixty 9- to 12-year-old children at risk of diabetes and sixty parents over 12 consecutive weeks with two intervention formats randomized by location: a face-to-face instructor-led program, or a hybrid program with alternating face-to-face and mobile technology-delivered content. Anthropometric, behavioral, psychosocial and physiological outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks), and follow-up (24 weeks). Secondary outcomes are participant acceptability, feasibility, and adherence. The RE-AIM framework (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) will guide intervention implementation and evaluation. Changes at 12 weeks will be assessed using a paired t-test combining both delivery formats. Exploratory models using linear regression analysis will estimate the magnitude of the difference between the face-to-face and hybrid format. The sample size of 60 children, informed by a previous YMCA intervention in which -4.3 % change in overweight (SE = 1.1) was observed over 6 months, will give us 80 % power to detect an effect size of this magnitude, assuming a one-sided test at alpha = 0.05. Discussion: The proposed study capitalizes on a partnership with the YMCA, a popular and widespread community organization, and uses mobile technologies to extend program reach while potentially reducing burden associated with weekly attendance. The long-term goal is to create a scalable, replicable, and sustainable pediatric "diabesity" prevention program that overcomes existing barriers to the translation of efficacious interventions into effective community programs.

References Powered by Scopus

Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man

27971Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin

15917Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012

6697Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Interventions for preventing obesity in children

446Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Feasibility of a family-focused YMCA-based diabetes prevention program in youth: The E.P.I.C. Kids (Encourage, Practice, and Inspire Change) Study

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Obesity in Adolescents A Review

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hingle, M. D., Turner, T., Kutob, R., Merchant, N., Roe, D. J., Stump, C., & Going, S. B. (2015). The EPIC Kids Study: A randomized family-focused YMCA-based intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk youth. BMC Public Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2595-3

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 153

68%

Researcher 30

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 28

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 85

41%

Nursing and Health Professions 66

32%

Psychology 35

17%

Social Sciences 20

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0