Caveats in the interpretation of the surgical literature

22Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The ability to appraise research literature critically is an invaluable tool in the era of evidence-based medicine. The objective of this educational article is to highlight certain caveats that are important to those who seek to interpret the surgical literature. These caveats are illustrated with intuitive examples drawn from the field of surgery. It is hoped that the article will help surgeons to recognize the common pitfalls encountered when interpreting scientific reports. This is important if research findings are to be transferred appropriately into the realm of clinical practice. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guller, U. (2008, May). Caveats in the interpretation of the surgical literature. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free