Fluchtgrund sexuelle Orientierung und Geschlechtsidentität: Auswirkungen von heteronormativem Wissen auf die Asylverfahren LGBTI-Geflüchteter

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article analyses how asylum claims based on queer sexual orientation or gender identity are negotiated in asylum procedures. Basing my analysis on Judith Butler's concept of heteronormativity, I examine which heteronormative arguments become salient in rejecting or approving asylum claims of LGBTI-refugees. My findings show problems associated with the credibility assessment and the dangers of either essentializing or denying queer identites. Moreover, I address the European Court of Justice's more recent decisions, which overruled demands for discretion, while remaining reticent on social discrimination, as well as veiling the problematics of criminalizing queer practices.

References Powered by Scopus

Homosexuality Identity Formation

1700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Constructing the personal narratives of Lesbian, gay and bisexual asylum claimants

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'The ring of truth': A case study of credibility Assessment in particular social group refugee determinations

125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Victimhood and femininities in Black lesbian asylum cases in Germany

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experiences of Minority Stress and Mental Health Burdens of Newly Arrived LGBTQ* Refugees in Germany

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Decision-Making Procedure

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hübner, K. (2016). Fluchtgrund sexuelle Orientierung und Geschlechtsidentität: Auswirkungen von heteronormativem Wissen auf die Asylverfahren LGBTI-Geflüchteter. Feministische Studien, 34(2), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2016-0005

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

80%

Decision Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0