Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in rural health facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania: An intervention study

24Citations
Citations of this article
179Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of an intervention consisting of a computer-assisted clinical decision support system and performance-based incentives, aiming at improving quality of antenatal and childbirth care. Methods: Intervention study in rural primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. In each country, six intervention and six non-intervention PHC facilities, located in one intervention and one non-intervention rural districts, were selected. Quality was assessed in each facility by health facility surveys, direct observation of antenatal and childbirth care, exit interviews, and reviews of patient records and maternal and child health registers. Findings of pre- and post-intervention and of intervention and non-intervention health facility quality assessments were analysed and assessed for significant (P < 0.05) quality of care differences. Results: Post-intervention quality scores do not show a clear difference to pre-intervention scores and scores at non-intervention facilities. Only a few variables had a statistically significant better post-intervention quality score and when this is the case this is mostly observed in only one study-arm, being pre-/post-intervention or intervention/non-intervention. Post-intervention care shows similar deficiencies in quality of antenatal and childbirth care and in detection, prevention, and management of obstetric complications as at baseline and non-intervention study facilities. Conclusion: Our intervention study did not show a significant improvement in quality of care during the study period. However, the use of new technology seems acceptable and feasible in rural PHC facilities in resource-constrained settings, creating the opportunity to use this technology to improve quality of care.

References Powered by Scopus

The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed?

5159Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review

2438Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success

2038Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

mhealth for clinical decision-making in sub-saharan africa: A scoping review

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A realist review to assess for whom, under what conditions and how pay for performance programmes work in low- and middle-income countries

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duysburgh, E., Temmerman, M., Yé, M., Williams, A., Massawe, S., Williams, J., … Blank, A. (2016). Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in rural health facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania: An intervention study. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 21(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12627

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 83

69%

Researcher 19

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 45

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 43

38%

Social Sciences 20

18%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free