Alternative approaches to alternative formats - Changing expectations by challenging myths

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Traditional textbooks can be difficult for print impaired learners to access. Every organisation has its own approach to providing alternative formats but there are common myths that need to be dispelled: the myth of responsibility, that alternative formats should be provided by disability support staff; the myth of specialism, that disabled students should be dealt with by a small team of specialist staff; and the myth that e-books are automatically accessible. This paper suggests a move beyond alternative formats to looking at alternative approaches to meeting the needs of print impaired students. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McNaught, A., & Featherstone, L. (2012). Alternative approaches to alternative formats - Changing expectations by challenging myths. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7382 LNCS, pp. 43–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31522-0_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free