Online virtual-patient cases versus traditional problem-based learning in advanced pharmacy practice experiences

61Citations
Citations of this article
154Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of faculty-led problem-based learning (PBL) vs online simulatedpatient case in fourth-year (P4) pharmacy students. Design. Fourth-year pharmacy students were randomly assigned to participate in either online branchedcase learning using a virtual simulation platform or a small-group discussion. Preexperience and postexperience student assessments and a survey instrument were completed. Evaluation. While there were no significant differences in the preexperience test scores between the groups, there was a significant increase in scores in both the virtual-patient group and the PBL group between the preexperience and postexperience tests. The PBL group had higher postexperience test scores (74.8±11.7) than did the virtual-patient group (66.5±13.6) (p50.001). Conclusion. The PBL method demonstrated significantly greater improvement in postexperience test scores than did the virtual-patient method. Both were successful learning methods, suggesting that a diverse approach to simulated patient cases may reach more student learning styles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Dahir, S., Bryant, K., Kennedy, K. B., & Robinson, D. S. (2014). Online virtual-patient cases versus traditional problem-based learning in advanced pharmacy practice experiences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(4). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78476

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free