Likelihood inference for models with unobservables: Another view

28Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There have been controversies among statisticians on (i) what to model and (ii) how to make inferences from models with unobservables. One such controversy concerns the difference between estimation methods for the marginal means not necessarily having a probabilistic basis and statistical models having unobservables with a probabilistic basis. Another concerns likelihood-based inference for statistical models with unobservables. This needs an extended-likelihood framework, and we show how one such extension, hierarchical likelihood, allows this to be done. Modeling of unobservables leads to rich classes of new probabilistic models from which likelihoodtype inferences can be made naturally with hierarchical likelihood. © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2009.

References Powered by Scopus

Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach

3699Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations

3577Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties

2701Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach: 3rd Edition

546Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dismantling the Mantel tests

394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationship between the digital economy, resource allocation and corporate carbon emission intensity: New evidence from listed Chinese companies

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, Y., & Nelder, J. A. (2009). Likelihood inference for models with unobservables: Another view. Statistical Science, 24(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS277

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

39%

Researcher 18

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 23

51%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

22%

Engineering 6

13%

Psychology 6

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free