GUIR at SemEval-2016 task 12: Temporal information processing for clinical narratives

11Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Extraction and interpretation of temporal information from clinical text is essential for clinical practitioners and researchers. SemEval 2016 Task 12 (Clinical TempEval) addressed this challenge using the THYME1 corpus, a corpus of clinical narratives annotated with a schema based on TimeML2 guidelines. We developed and evaluated approaches for: extraction of temporal expressions (TIMEX3) and EVENTs; TIMEX3 and EVENT attributes; document-time relations; and narrative container relations. Our approach is based on supervised learning (crf and logistic regression), utilizing various sets of syntactic, lexical and semantic features with addition of manually crafted rules. Our system demonstrated substantial improvements over the baselines in all the tasks.

References Powered by Scopus

The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): Integrating biomedical terminology

3322Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles

1666Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An overview of MetaMap: Historical perspective and recent advances

1178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

SemEval-2016 task 12: Clinical TempEval

156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neural architecture for temporal relation extraction: A Bi-LSTM approach for detecting narrative containers

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extraction of temporal relations from clinical free text: A systematic review of current approaches

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohan, A., Meurer, K., & Goharian, N. (2016). GUIR at SemEval-2016 task 12: Temporal information processing for clinical narratives. In SemEval 2016 - 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Proceedings (pp. 1248–1255). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s16-1194

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

72%

Researcher 7

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 32

78%

Linguistics 5

12%

Neuroscience 2

5%

Engineering 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0