The stability of house dust mite allergens in glycerinated extracts

32Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Mite allergen vaccines are important diagnostic and immunotherapeutic reagents. Previous studies on mite allergen stability under different storage conditions have yielded contradictory results. Objective: We sought to compare, over a 12-month period, the stability of mite allergens reconstituted in 50% glycerol and stored at different temperatures and to examine the role of protease inhibitors in enhancing allergen stability. Methods: Lyophilized allergen extracts were reconstituted in 50% glycerol, with and without protease inhibitors, and stored at -70°C, -20°C, 4°C, or 37°C for 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, the extracts were compared with freshly dissolved extracts by competition ELISA with pooled allergic sera, 2- site ELISA with mite-specific mAbs, and immunoblot analyses. Results: The overall potencies of the stored extracts measured by competition ELISA were stable at -20°C and 4°C. As determined by means of the immunoblot and 2- site ELISA, Der f 1 levels decreased at 4°C. Levels of Der f 2, Der p 1, and Der p 2 decreased in at least one of the allergen-specific assays. Storage at 37°C led to overall loss of potency and allergen content, whereas storage at -70°C was associated with a moderate loss of potency that increased with multiple freeze-thaw cycles. Protease inhibitors had no effect on allergen stability. Conclusion: Although overall potency of the extracts, as measured by competition ELISA, was preserved at -20°C and 4°C, allergen-specific assays indicated loss of allergens. These findings suggest that the competition ELISA is insensitive to decreases in the concentrations of individual allergens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soldatova, L. N., Paupore, E. J., Burk, S. H., Pastor, R. W., & Slater, J. E. (2000). The stability of house dust mite allergens in glycerinated extracts. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 105(3), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2000.104549

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free