The cultural sciences and their basis in life. On ernst cassirer’s theory of the cultural sciences

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The cultural philosopher Ernst Cassirer campaigns for the idea of a unity between natural and cultural science. He polemizes, however, against the idea of the ‘unified science’ as proclaimed by the ‘Vienna circle’ which favoured physics and the concrete sense perception as the only forms of objectification. The personalemotional experience of expressive perception which constitutes forms of culture and is therefore the starting point for any cultural science engagement is considered by Cassirer to be an independent and alternative form of objectification of the mind. In his opinion, expressive perception genetically precedes the perception of sense qualities. Both types of science are connected by the relations they draw between the singular and the general. They can be differentiated by their targets - respectively objective laws and subjective shapes or forms. By referring to the emotional expressive perception Cassirer insolubly connects the ‘primary phenomenon of life’ and its appropriate characteristic of the mental life with concept formation within the cultural sciences. His theory of “basis phenomena” as the final modes of the constitution of reality within perception provides a framework for concept formation that is centered around the “basis in life” and the “life feeling”. Forms of life, physiognomic imprinting of sense and epochal character of style are associated in the concepts of the cultural sciences with a specific demand for generality and objectivity which simultaneously differentiates them from the concepts of natural science whilst also equating them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Möckel, C. (2012). The cultural sciences and their basis in life. On ernst cassirer’s theory of the cultural sciences. In Special Sciences and the Unity of Science (pp. 259–267). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2030-5_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free