Economic evaluation of a person-centred care intervention in head and neck oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial

14Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Head and neck cancer and its treatment deteriorate quality of life, but symptoms improve with person-centred care. We examined the cost-effectiveness of a person-centred care intervention versus standard medical care. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial of a person-centred intervention, patients were planned for outpatient oncology treatment in a Swedish university hospital between 2012 and 2014 and were followed during 1 year. Annual healthcare costs were identified from medical records and administrative register data. Productivity costs were calculated from reported sick leave. Health-related quality of life was collected using the EuroQol Group’s five-dimension health state questionnaire. Results: Characteristics were similar between 53 patients in the intervention group and 39 control patients. The average total cost was Euro (EUR) 55,544 (95% confidence interval: EUR 48,474–62,614) in the intervention group and EUR 57,443 (EUR 48,607–66,279) among controls, with similar health-related quality of life. Conclusions: This person-centred intervention did not result in increased costs and dominated the standard medical care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT02982746).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gyllensten, H., Koinberg, I., Carlström, E., Olsson, L. E., & Hansson Olofsson, E. (2019). Economic evaluation of a person-centred care intervention in head and neck oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(5), 1825–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4436-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free