Books: Evidence-biased Antidepressant Prescription: Overmedicalisation, Flawed Research, and Conflicts of Interest

  • Brown M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Michael P Hengartner Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, HB, 361pp, £109.99, 978-3030825867 Hengartner begins ‘Over my academic career, I went into different stages of belief and disbelief.’ In his studies of clinical psychology and psychopathology in Switzerland in the early 2000s Hengartner learned about Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) psychiatric diagnoses as if these were clear-cut natural disease entities, and was taught that this is how humans think, behave, and feel because it has been confirmed in this or that study. He never considered ‘that many, perhaps most of these studies, could be simply wrong.’ His discomfort began in 2010 when, as a PhD student, doing what he had been taught at university and by his supervisors somehow ‘didn’t feel right.’ After completing his PhD in 2014 he took up a tenured position at the Zurich University of Applied Sciences, where metascience, research methodology, statistics, and the philosophy of science became his primary research interests. In this post Hengartner searched the …

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, M. (2022). Books: Evidence-biased Antidepressant Prescription: Overmedicalisation, Flawed Research, and Conflicts of Interest. British Journal of General Practice, 72(716), 126–126. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22x718721

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free