The reliability and validity for Japanese type 2 diabetes patients of the Japanese version of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire

3Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determing which psychological traits of Japanese type 2 diabetes patients would provide reliability and validity to the Japanese version of the Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire (AADQ-J). Methods: Various questionnaires were administered to type 2 diabetes patients who were registered on the database of the research service provider; data from a total of 600 patients (mean ± SD age was 57.50 ± 9.87 years, female 21.83%) were analyzed. Results: Three items were excluded because of psychometric concerns related to the original 11-item AADQ. Confirmation factor analyses revealed that the eight-item version demonstrated the best indicators of a goodness of fit. The questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency. The questionnaire demonstrated high measurement accuracy in broad trait values by the test information function of Item Response Theory. The questionnaire showed stronger positive correlations with self-care activities and HbA1c than with diabetes distress and depressive mood. Conclusions: The eight-item Japanese version of AADQ has reliability and validity for type 2 diabetes patients.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saito, J., Shoji, W., & Kumano, H. (2018). The reliability and validity for Japanese type 2 diabetes patients of the Japanese version of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-018-0129-9

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

87%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 8

62%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

23%

Computer Science 1

8%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0