In vitro prediction of the evolution of GES-1 β-lactamase hydrolytic activity

21Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Resistance to β-lactams is constantly increasing due to the emergence of totally new enzymes but also to the evolution of preexisting β-lactamases. GES-1 is a clinically relevant extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) that hydrolyzes penicillins and broadspectrum cephalosporins but spares monobactams and carbapenems. However, several GES-1 variants (i.e., GES-2 and GES-5) previously identified among clinical isolates display an extended spectrum of activity toward carbapenems. To study the evolution potential of the GES-1 β-lactamase, this enzyme was submitted to in vitro-directed evolution, with selection on increasing concentrations of the cephalosporin cefotaxime, the monobactam aztreonam, or the carbapenem imipenem. The highest resistance levels were conferred by a combination of up to four substitutions. The A6T-E104K-G243A variant selected on cefotaxime and the A6T-E104K-T237A-G243A variant selected on aztreonam conferred high resistance to cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam. Conversely, the A6T-G170S variant selected on imipenem conferred high resistance to imipenem and cefoxitin. Of note, the A6T substitution involved in higher MICs for all β-lactams is located in the leader peptide of the GES enzyme and therefore is not present in the mature protein. Acquired cross-resistance was not observed, since selection with cefotaxime or aztreonam did not select for resistance to imipenem, and vice versa. Here, we demonstrate that the β-lactamase GES-1 exhibits peculiar properties, with a significant potential to gain activity against broad-spectrum cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bontron, S., Poirel, L., & Nordmann, P. (2015). In vitro prediction of the evolution of GES-1 β-lactamase hydrolytic activity. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 59(3), 1664–1670. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.04450-14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free