Hypercoagulable workup in a community hospital setting: to test or not to test; that is the question

  • Gupta A
  • Patel P
  • Anwar R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Thrombophilia tests are often ordered unnecessarily and/or inappropriately, with significant impact on healthcare costs, hospital resources, time, and potential harm to the patient. Objective: To identify the incidence of unnecessary and inappropriate thrombophilia testing in a community hospital setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records for patients who underwent inpatient thrombophilia testing at The Brooklyn Hospital Center from 1/1/2018 to 12/31/2018. The indications, and details of the tests, and associated costs were recorded. Results: A total of 62 patients were included (mean age 45.8, 67.7% female). In 57/62 (91.9%) patients, tests were ordered in the acute phase of thrombosis. At the time the tests were ordered, 29/62 (46.8%) patients were on anticoagulation. Positive results were found in 21/62 (53.2%) patients, but was repeated in only 1/21 (4.7%) patient. Results for 51/62 (82%) patients were obtained after discharge. The hematol)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gupta, A., Patel, P., Anwar, R., Villanueva, D., Vasudevan, V., & Guevara, E. (2019). Hypercoagulable workup in a community hospital setting: to test or not to test; that is the question. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 9(5), 392–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1655627

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free