Mélanges and broken formations at the boundary zone of the Magura and Silesian nappes (Gorlice area, Polish Outer Carpathians) – A result of sedimentary and tectonic processes

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Based on geological field mapping, analyses of cores from explanatory boreholes, and foraminiferal age control data, we have differentiated four types of mélanges and broken formations at the bordering zone between the Magura and Silesian nappes (Gorlice area in the Polish Outer Carpathians). These mélanges and broken formations differ in composition and structure due to different settings and processes of their formation. Several levels of broken formations within the upper most part of the Krosno Beds were formed as mass-transport deposits at the southern slope of the Silesian Basin. They may record tectonic pulses related to advancing accretionary wedge within Magura area and directly predate the stage of the larger-scale sedime tary mélange formation at the front of the wedge. This mélange is composed mainly of the material representing the Magura succession (Siary Subunit) and the Krosno type sediments of the Silesian succession. It was emplaced within the Silesian Basin in the Early Miocene time. The so-called “Harklowa peninsula”, whose geological structure has been the subject of discussions and various in terpretations in the past years, is built of this type of mélange. The other recognized type of broken formation and mélange represents the chaotic bodies of tectonic origin formed at the base of the Magura Nappe.The results of our studies contribute to better understanding of the structural evolution of this part of the Outer Carpathians.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Starzec, K., Malata, E., Wronka, A., & Malina, L. (2015). Mélanges and broken formations at the boundary zone of the Magura and Silesian nappes (Gorlice area, Polish Outer Carpathians) – A result of sedimentary and tectonic processes. Geological Quarterly, 59(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.7306/gq.1173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free