VOLUNTARY PRIVATE PENSION FUNDS AND CAPITAL MARKET DEVELOPMENT

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examine voluntary private pension funds and their relationship to capital market development. Using data from Turkey, we analyse depth, efficiency and liquidity indicators of capital markets after the introduction of voluntary private pension funds in 2003. Overall, our findings indicate that the introduction of voluntary private pension plans are positively associated with indicators of capital market development, focusing on market depth (such as market capitalisation and trading volume) in both debt and equity markets. We also observe that indicators for other more recently established markets are also positively associated with the introduction of voluntary pension plans. In contrast, equity market turnover shows a negative association. These findings, along with the positive association with the corporate governance index, suggest that pension funds are important for capital market development and for corporate governance of firms as they are long-term investors. However, the introduction of state contributions in 2013 is not robust to alternative specifications.

References Powered by Scopus

Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships

11504Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects

5275Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Finance and growth: schumpeter might be right

4210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

ASEAN in the World’s 100 Top-Ranked Pension Funds: Lessons for Indonesia

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eğrican, A. T., & Kayhan, F. (2022). VOLUNTARY PRIVATE PENSION FUNDS AND CAPITAL MARKET DEVELOPMENT. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 18(2), 195–240. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2022.18.2.9

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0