Categories, Balancing, and Fake News: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

7Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Freedom of expression has been often described as a necessary precondition for democracy and for the implementation of an effective system of human rights. A deliberative democracy cannot function if citizens are not granted the fundamental right to express their views and to criticize the government without being censored.1 The rule of law becomes an empty notion if legal orders do not protect the impartial, autonomous judgments of the judiciary.2

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sardo, A. (2020). Categories, Balancing, and Fake News: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 33(2), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free