Setting site specific critical loads: An approach using endorsement theory and Dempster-Shafer

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is an increasing demand from conservation agencies for site-specific critical loads (CL); unfortunately, there is often very little specific information on a site to determine the important parameters needed to calculate the CL or on the spatial location of the designated feature in a site. Determining the most appropriate CL therefore involves using expert judegement to make decisions with incomplete and uncertain information. Endorsement Theory (Cohen, 1985) and Dempster-Shafer statistics (Dempster, 1967; Shafer, 1976) are, respectively, a decision-theoretic and a statistical technique for reasoning under those conditions (uncertainty and incompletness). A key reason for applying these techniques is that they make expert opinion explicit and available for scrutiny. Both techniques have been applied to the problem of setting an appropriate site specific CL, using heathland sites as a case study. Inital findings are encouraging; the uncertainty in expert judgement is made explict, the end results are intuitively reasonable and the methodology apparently acceptable to decision makers. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wadsworth, R. A., & Hall, J. R. (2007). Setting site specific critical loads: An approach using endorsement theory and Dempster-Shafer. In Acid Rain - Deposition to Recovery (pp. 399–405). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5885-1_45

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free