Dose response of somatosensory cortex repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on vibrotactile detection: A randomized sham-controlled trial

5Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This randomized sham-controlled trial investigated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the somatosensory cortex contralateral to hand dominance for dose-response (1 mA, 20 min x 5 days) effects on vibrotactile detection thresholds (VDT). VDT was measured before and after tDCS on days 1, 3, and 5 for low-(30 Hz) and high-frequency (200 Hz) vibrations on the dominant and nondominant hands in 29 healthy adults (mean age = 22.86 yr; 15 men, 14 women). Only the dominant-hand 200-Hz VDT displayed statistically significant medium effect size improvement for mixed-model analysis of variance time-by-group interaction for active tDCS compared with sham. Post hoc contrasts were statistically significant for dominant-hand 200-Hz VDT on day 5 after tDCS compared with day 1 before tDCS, day 1 after tDCS, and day 3 before tDCS. There was a linear dose-response improvement with dominant-hand 200-Hz VDT mean difference decreasing from day 1 before tDCS peaking at -15.5% (SD = 34.9%) on day 5 after tDCS. Both groups showed learning effect trends over time for all VDT test conditions, but only the nondominant-hand 30-Hz VDT was statistically significant (P = 0.03), although post hoc contrasts were nonsignificant after Šidák adjustment. No adverse effects for tDCS were reported. In conclusion, anodal tDCS at 1 mA, 20 min x 5 days on the dominant sensory cortex can modulate a linear improvement of dominant-hand high-frequency VDT but not low-frequency or nondominant-hand VDT. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Repeated weak anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (1 mA, 20 min) on the dominant sensory cortex provides linear improvement in dominant-hand high-frequency vibration detection thresholds. No effects were observed for low-frequency or nondominant-hand vibration detection thresholds.

References Powered by Scopus

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

44777Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation

4444Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008

2417Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can transcranial electrical stimulation localize brain function?

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Therapeutic benefits of noninvasive somatosensory cortex stimulation on cortical plasticity and somatosensory function: A systematic review

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Folmli, B., Turman, B., Johnson, P., & Abbott, A. (2018). Dose response of somatosensory cortex repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on vibrotactile detection: A randomized sham-controlled trial. Journal of Neurophysiology, 120(2), 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00926.2017

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

52%

Researcher 8

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 10

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

15%

Psychology 3

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free