La actuación de estudiantes de educación primaria en un proceso de invención de problemas

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This investigation analyzes how 351 students across six levels of primary education acted when they invented problems. Student beliefs are studied regarding the usefulness of knowing how to solve problems, as well as the formulation of their problem statements, taking into account coherence, operational structure and the number of operations needed to solve the problem. An ad hoc test questionnaire was designed and the data was statistically analyzed (SPSS). From the age of six, students were observed to invent problem statements that constitute mathematical problems and as they progress to the next grade, their inventions become more complex in terms of operational structure; in addition, they invent problems involving at least two operations.

References Powered by Scopus

An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students

278Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Children's problem posing within formal and informal contexts

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from?

194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Knowledge and Competencies of Prospective Teachers for the Creation of Proportionality Problems

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Creation of proportionality problems for the training of prospective primary school teachers

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A model for problem creation: implications for teacher training

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ayllón Blanco, M. F., Gallego Ortega, J. L., & Gómez Pérez, I. A. (2016). La actuación de estudiantes de educación primaria en un proceso de invención de problemas. Perfiles Educativos, 38(152), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2016.152.57588

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 4

40%

Mathematics 4

40%

Philosophy 1

10%

Chemistry 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0