Comparison of ultrasound and electrical neurostimulation guidance in axillary brachial plexus block

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare ultrasound guidance (USG) and electrical neurostimulation guidance (ENSG) in axillary brachial plexus block in terms of block performing time, sensory and motor block quality, and patient satisfaction. Methodology: 200 patients undergoing elective carpal tunnel syndrome surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups equally; the USG group or the ENSG group. Axillary blocks were performed with a mixture of 15 ml of lidocaine 2% and 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% (a total of 30 ml solution). Sensory block was evaluated with a pinprick test and motor block was evaluated via the Bromage scale by a blinded observer. Results: Block performing time was significantly shorter in the USG group than in the ENSG group (P<0.001). The sensory and motor block onset times were significandy shorter and the additional analgesic requirements were significandy lower in the USG group than in the ENSG group (P<0.001). Conclusion: USG is better than ENSG in axillary brachial plexus block in terms of block performing time, block quality and patient satisfaction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ozturk, O., Bilge, A., Tezcan, A. H., Tezcan, H. Y. A. H., Ulusoy, G. R., Gezgin, I., & Dost, B. (2016). Comparison of ultrasound and electrical neurostimulation guidance in axillary brachial plexus block. Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care, 20(1), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v0i0.1243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free