Improving the scalability of rule base verification using binary decision diagrams: An empirical study

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As their field of application has evolved and matured, the importance of verifying knowledge-based systems is now widely recognized. Nevertheless, some problems have remained. In recent work, we have addressed the poor scalability to larger systems of the ATMS-inspired computation methods commonly applied to rule-chain anomaly checking. To tackle this problem, we introduced a novel anomaly checking method based on binary decision diagrams (BDDs), a technique emanating originally from the hardware design community. In this paper, we present further empirical evidence of its computational efficiency on real-life rule bases. In addition, we will investigate the issue of BDD variable ordering, and its impact on the efficiency of the computations. Thereby, we will also assess the utility of dynamic reordering. © 2004 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mues, C., & Vanthienen, J. (2004). Improving the scalability of rule base verification using binary decision diagrams: An empirical study. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3238 LNAI, pp. 381–395). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30221-6_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free