Pulmonary vasoreactivity and phenotypes in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated to connective tissue diseases

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a fatal complication in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD). Objective: The objective of the study was to study the prognostic value of the acute pulmonary vasoreactivity test with inhaled iloprost and its association with clinical deterioration in a tertiary care academic medical center. Methods: We conducted a prospective study of patients with CTD and the diagnosis of PAH established by right heart catheterization. Patients were classified into classic responders, partial responders, and non-responders. The association of the pulmonary response and clinical deterioration was analyzed. Results: We enrolled 25 patients (mean age of 47 ± 13.4 years); 88% were female. The most frequent rheumatologic diagnosis was systemic lupus erythematosus, in 16 (64%) patients. Seventy-two percent of patients were classified as non-responders, and 28% were partial responders. Patients with a partial response had lower right atrial pressure values (5.1 ± 3.1 vs. 8.5 ± 3.2, p = 0.01) and greater systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (87.6 ± 8.1 vs. 72.4 ± 16.2, p = 0.02), compared with non-responders. Non-responders had a tendency for a shorter time to clinical deterioration than partial responders (17.8 vs. 41.1 months, p = 0.052). Conclusions: Patients with a partial response to the acute pulmonary vasodilator test with inhaled iloprost had a longer clinical deterioration-free period than non-responders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernández-Oropeza, J. L., Rodríguez-Reyna, T. S., Carrillo-Perez, D. L., De Jesús rodríguez-Andoney, J., Narváez-David, R., Salado-Morales, Y., … Pulido-Zamudio, T. (2018). Pulmonary vasoreactivity and phenotypes in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated to connective tissue diseases. Revista de Investigacion Clinica, 70(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.18002437

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free