Comparison of three assay systems for detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this study, a commercial DNA-DNA hybridization kit for the detection of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin is compared with a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the suckling mouse bioassay. Taking the suckling mouse assay as the 'gold standard', the gene probe was the more specific and the ELISA was the more sensitive of the assays. The ELISA and the suckling mouse test are semiquantitative. The ELISA was the most rapid method, most amenable to automation, and most suitable for the examination of large numbers of specimens. The gene probe is particularly applicable in relatively primitive laboratory conditions. The suckling mouse assay was the least suitable system for the examination of large numbers of specimens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cryan, B. (1990). Comparison of three assay systems for detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 28(4), 792–794. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.28.4.792-794.1990

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free