Climate Change, Ethics, and the Wildness of Wild Animals

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter is a first attempt to consider ways in which anthropogenic climate change may reduce the wildness of wild animals, and explores ethical and value concerns such a reduction might raise. The chapter begins by outlining key impacts a warming climate may have on animal lives. Then it explores different meanings of “wildness” in the context of wild animals, concluding that climate change might reduce both “constitutive” and “self-willed” animal wildness—forms of wildness that many people value. Ethical responses to these potential value losses are shaped by whether a deontological or consequentialist approach to wildness value is adopted. The chapter suggests that consequentialists about wildness value have a range of positive policy options, because they can pursue the creation of new, future animal wildness. Deontologists about wildness value have fewer options, because their focus is on not compromising existing animal wildness, even when doing so would create more wildness in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palmer, C. (2016). Climate Change, Ethics, and the Wildness of Wild Animals. In International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics (Vol. 23, pp. 131–150). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44206-8_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free