Maintaining intraoperative normothermia reduces blood loss in patients undergoing major operations: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial

34Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia (core temperature<36°C) is a common but preventable adverse event. This study aimed to determine whether active intraoperative warming reduced bleeding in patients undergoing major operations: open thoracic surgery and hip replacement surgery. Methods/Design: The study was a pilot, prospective, parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to two groups: passive warming (PW), with application of a cotton blanket (thermal insulation), or active warming (AW), with a forced-air warming system. The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss, and secondary endpoints were surgical-site infection, cardiovascular events, and length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit, intensive care unit, and hospital. Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled. Forced-air active warming maintained intraoperative normothermia in all AW subjects, whereas intraoperative hypothermia occurred in 21/32 (71.8%) of PW patients (p=0.000). The volume of blood loss was more in the PW group (682±426ml) than in the AW group (464±324ml) (p<0.021), and the perioperative hemoglobin value declined more in the PW group (28.6±17.5g/L) than in the AW group (21.0±9.9g/L) (p=0.045). However, there were no difference in other clinical outcomes between two groups. Conclusion: Intraoperative active warming is associated with less blood loss than passive warming in open thoracic and hip replacement operations in this pilot study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yi, J., Liang, H., Song, R., Xia, H., & Huang, Y. (2018). Maintaining intraoperative normothermia reduces blood loss in patients undergoing major operations: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0582-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free