The patient comes to the doctor asking to be cure and the doctor agrees with it. it is the of terapeutic transaction, in inspanningsverbintenis, the doctor maximally tries to cure the patient, but he can not promise a certain recovery. In the resultaatsverbintenis, the agreement is based on the working result, for example a dentist who makes an artificial teeth, must fixed to the transaction made with his patient. In the resultaatsverbintenis can be implemented in the rule of the customer protection (UU Perlindungan Konsumen}, yet in the inspanningsverbintenis has become controversy. It is caused for the inspanningsverbintenis and the resultaatsverbintenis, its authority and the responsibility of the doctors are deferent. Therefore, it needs to be understood in competence, the authority and the responsibility from the medicolegal aspect.
CITATION STYLE
putra, sarsintorini. (2001). Inspanningsverbintenis dan Resultaatsverbintenis dalam Transaksi Terapeutik Kaitannya dengan UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 8(18), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol8.iss18.art14
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.