Partial least squares prediction in high-dimensional regression

34Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the asymptotic behavior of predictions from partial least squares (PLS) regression as the sample size and number of predictors diverge in various alignments. We show that there is a range of regression scenarios where PLS predictions have the usual root-n convergence rate, even when the sample size is substantially smaller than the number of predictors, and an even wider range where the rate is slower but may still produce practically useful results. We show also that PLS predictions achieve their best asymptotic behavior in abundant regressions where many predictors contribute information about the response. Their asymptotic behavior tends to be undesirable in sparse regressions where few predictors contribute information about the response.

References Powered by Scopus

A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools

1769Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SIMPLS: An alternative approach to partial least squares regression

1629Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tumor classification by partial least squares using microarray gene expression data

686Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Partial least squares prediction in high-dimensional regression

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the role of partial least squares in path analysis for the social sciences

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PLS regression algorithms in the presence of nonlinearity

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cook, R. D., & Forzani, L. (2019). Partial least squares prediction in high-dimensional regression. Annals of Statistics, 47(2), 884–908. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOS1681

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

68%

Researcher 5

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 10

59%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

18%

Computer Science 2

12%

Neuroscience 2

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 40

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0