ACADEMIC IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT OF ASIAN INTERNATIONAL DOCTORAL STUDENTS AT A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY – A REFLEXIVE THEMATIC ANALYSIS

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims/ Purpose This study explores the development of academic identity among a group of Asian international doctoral students at a U.S. research university in various settings, including interacting with students and faculty members and reflecting on their personal journeys. Background In 2020-2021, 132, 000 international doctoral students enrolled in U.S. universities – an increase of 71% since 2000. Despite this, relatively little is known about their academic identity development and how acculturative stress affects their academic growth. Methodology A conceptual framework was constructed to integrate the concepts of acculturative stress and academic identity development. With the premise that academic identity development comprises three strands of intellectual, network, and institutional, the current framework conceptualizes the intersection of acculturative stress in all three strands to explore the tensions of balancing home-host culture values while international doctoral students grow into a new identity. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied to study the narratives of eight Asian international doctoral students and identified four main themes characterizing the participants’ academic identity development under acculturative stress. Contribution This study contributes to an understudied area of higher education literature, directing the attention of the academic community to a small but growing group of junior academics. When examined in the confluence with acculturative stress, the conceptualization of academic identity is extended to include academics from cultural minorities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pham, T. (2022). ACADEMIC IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT OF ASIAN INTERNATIONAL DOCTORAL STUDENTS AT A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY – A REFLEXIVE THEMATIC ANALYSIS. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17, 323–344. https://doi.org/10.28945/5013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free