Foreskin morbidity in uncircumcised males

37Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As a consequence of the discussion on whether the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and the discrepancies in reported figures of complications, we evaluated the incidence and morbidity of foreskin surgery due to medical indications in boys from the Capital Region of Denmark in 2014. METHODS: Medical records from all boys operated on the foreskin due to medical reasons in the Capital Region in 2014 were reviewed. Patients with hypospadias, ritual circumcision, and redo-surgery because of complications to nontherapeutic circumcision were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were included. The cumulative risk of undergoing foreskin operation before 18 years of age was 1.7%. Forty patients had histologic verified balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) corresponding to a total risk of 0.37% of developing BXO. Mean age at surgery was 10.1 years (range 1-17). Phimosis was the most frequently reported indication (95.0%). The remaining 5.0% underwent surgery because of frenulum breve causing problems during erection. Before surgery, 27.1% had foreskin-related voiding problems and 17.1% had at least 1 episode of balanitis. Circumcision was initially performed in 44 cases. The remaining 137 patients had a foreskin-preserving operation performed. Nine boys had secondary circumcision after initially having foreskin-preserving operation. Fifty patients initially had preputial histology performed. BXO was verified in 37 patients. Of the 9 patients with redo-surgery due to recurrent phimosis, a further 3 had histologically verified BXO. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood foreskin-related problems in a region with no tradition of newborn male circumcision should not be neglected.

References Powered by Scopus

Male circumcision

306Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans

265Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human semen quality in the new millennium: A prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men

252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Penile inflammatory skin disorders and the preventive role of circumcision

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: A critical assessment of recent evidence

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sneppen, I., & Thorup, J. (2016). Foreskin morbidity in uncircumcised males. Pediatrics, 137(5). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4340

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

19%

Researcher 5

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 29

81%

Social Sciences 3

8%

Chemical Engineering 2

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0