Chol Understandings of Suicide and Human Agency

7Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to ethnographic material collected since 2003, the Chol Mayan indigenous people in southern Mexico have different causal explanations for suicide. It can be attributed to witchcraft that forces victims to take their lives against their own will, to excessive drinking, or to fate determined by God. However, it can also be conceived of as a conscious decision made by a person overwhelmed by daily problems. Drawing from the theoretical framework developed by Laura M. Ahearn, inspired by practice theory, the paper contends that these different explanations operate within two different logics or understandings of human agency. The first logic attributes responsibility to supernatural causes such as witchcraft or divine destiny, and reflects Chol notions of personhood. The second logic accepts personal responsibility for suicide, and is related to processes of social change such as the introduction of wage labor, education and a market economy. The contemporary Chol resort to both logics to make sense of the human drama of suicide. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Imberton, G. (2012). Chol Understandings of Suicide and Human Agency. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 36(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-012-9252-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free