SUBJECTNESS OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY: THREATS, CHALLENGES, AND RISKS1

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the risks, threats, and challenges associated with possible social changes in the processes of digitalization of society and transformations of traditional communication practices, which is associated with the emergence of new digital subjects of mass public communication that form the pseudo structure of digital interaction of people. The primary tasks of the work were to identify the potential of artificial intelligence technologies and neural networks in the field of social and political communications, as well as to analyze the features of “smart” communications in terms of their subjectness. As a methodological optics, the work used the method of discourse analysis of scientific research devoted to the implementation and application of artificial intelligence technologies and self-learning neural networks in the processes of social and political digitalization, as well as the method of critical analysis of current communication practices in the socio-political sphere. At the same time, when analyzing the current digitalization practices, the case study method was used. The authors substantiate the thesis that introducing technological solutions based on artificial intelligence algorithms and self-learning neural networks into contemporary processes of socio-political communication creates the potential for a wide range of challenges, threats, and risks, the key of which is the problem of identifying the actual subjects of digital communication acts. The article also discusses the problem of increasing the manipulative potential of “smart” communications, for which the authors used the concepts of cyber simulacrum and information capsule developed by them. The paper shows that artificial intelligence and self-learning neural network algorithms, being increasingly widely introduced into the current practice of contemporary digital communications, form a high potential for information and communication impact on the mass consciousness from technological solutions that no longer require control by operators – humans. As a result, conditions arise to form a hybrid socio-technical reality – a communication reality of a new type with mixed subjectness. The paper also concludes that in the current practices of social interactions in the digital space, a person faces a new phenomenon – interfaceization, within which self-communication stimulates the universalization and standardization of digital behavior, creating, disseminating, strengthening, and imposing special digital rituals. In the article, the authors suggest that digital rituals blur the line between the activity of digital avatars based on artificial intelligence and the activity of actual people, resulting in the potential for a person to lose his own subjectness in the digital communications space.

References Powered by Scopus

Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior

1868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook

729Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready

712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Towards the Digital Risk Society: A Review

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semantic space of the subject area of research on communicative practices in a virtual environment

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Volodenkov, S., & Fedorchenko, S. (2021). SUBJECTNESS OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY: THREATS, CHALLENGES, AND RISKS1. Przeglad Strategiczny, (14), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2021.1.25

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

40%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

25%

Decision Sciences 1

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free