A laboratory investigation of multiperson rationality and presentation effects

89Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper reports the results of laboratory experiments in which subjects were presented with different two-person decision problems in both their extensive and normal forms. All games generated the same equilibrium outcomes. Our results indicate that the presentation of the decision problem significantly affects the strategy chosen. Surprisingly, these presentation effects were most prominent in the simplest games where differences in presentation would seem most transparent. It appears that subjects are much more likely to use (and fear) incredible threats when the problem is presented as a one-stage rather than as a multistage game. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: 026, 215. © 1994 Academic Press. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Toward a positive theory of consumer choice

3426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games

1859Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Credible assignments in coordination games

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics

521Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The strategy versus the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons

424Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rationality in economics: Constructivist and ecological forms

325Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schotter, A., Weigelt, K., & Wilson, C. (1994). A laboratory investigation of multiperson rationality and presentation effects. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1026

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

39%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13

68%

Psychology 3

16%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Philosophy 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0