Comparison of public end-to-end bandwidth estimation tools on high-speed links

62Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we present results of a series of bandwidth estimation experiments conducted on a high-speed testbed at the San Diego Supercomputer Center and on OC-48 and GigE paths in real world networks. We test and compare publicly available bandwidth estimation tools: abing, pathchirp, pathload, and Spruce. We also tested Iperf which measures achievable TCP throughput. In the lab we used two different sources of known and reproducible cross-traffic in a fully controlled environment. In real world networks we had a complete knowledge of link capacities and had access to SNMP counters for independent cross-traffic verification. We compare the accuracy and other operational characteristics of the tools and analyze factors impacting their performance. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shriram, A., Murray, M., Hyun, Y., Brownlee, N., Broido, A., Fomenkov, M., & Claffy, K. (2005). Comparison of public end-to-end bandwidth estimation tools on high-speed links. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3431, pp. 306–320). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31966-5_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free