Bias-variance analysis of local classification methods

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years an increasing amount of so called local classification methods has been developed. Local approaches to classification are not new. Well-known examples are the k nearest neighbors method and classification trees (e.g. CART). However, the term 'local' is usually used without further explanation of its particular meaning, we neither know which properties local methods have nor for which types of classification problems they may be beneficial. In order to address these problems we conduct a benchmark study. Based on 26 artificial and real-world data sets selected local and global classification methods are analyzed in terms of the bias-variance decomposition of the misclassification rate. The results support our intuition that local methods exhibit lower bias compared to global counterparts. This reduction comes at the price of an only slightly increased variance such that the error rate in total may be improved. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schiffner, J., Bischl, B., & Weihs, C. (2012). Bias-variance analysis of local classification methods. In Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization (pp. 49–57). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24466-7_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free