Technology-Mediated Enrichment in Aged Care: Survey and Interview Study

15Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Digital technologies such as virtual reality (VR), humanoid robots, and digital companion pets have the potential to provide social and emotional enrichment for people living in aged care. However, there is currently limited knowledge about how technologies are being used to provide enrichment, what benefits they provide, and what challenges arise when deploying these technologies in aged care settings. Objective: This study aims to investigate how digital technologies are being used for social and emotional enrichment in the Australian aged care industry and identify the benefits and challenges of using technology for enrichment in aged care. Methods: A web-based survey (N=20) was distributed among people working in the Australian aged care sector. The survey collected information about the types of technologies being deployed and their perceived value. The survey was followed by semistructured interviews (N=12) with aged care workers and technology developers to investigate their experiences of deploying technologies with older adults living in aged care. Survey data were analyzed using summary descriptive statistics and categorizing open-ended text responses. Interview data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: The survey revealed that a range of commercial technologies, such as VR, tablet devices, and mobile phones, are being used in aged care to support social activities and provide entertainment. Respondents had differing views about the value of emerging technologies, such as VR, social robots, and robot pets, but were more united in their views about the value of videoconferencing. Interviews revealed 4 types of technology-mediated enrichment experiences: enhancing social engagement, virtually leaving the care home, reconnecting with personal interests, and providing entertainment and distraction. Our analysis identified 5 barriers: resource constraints, the need to select appropriate devices and apps, client challenges, limited staff and organizational support, and family resistance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that technologies can be used in aged care to create personally meaningful enrichment experiences for aged care clients. To maximize the effectiveness of technology-mediated enrichment, we argue that a person-centered care approach is crucial. Although enrichment experiences can be created using available technologies, they must be carefully selected and co-deployed with aged care clients. However, significant changes may be required within organizations to allow caregivers to facilitate individual technology-based activities for enrichment.

References Powered by Scopus

Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

5423Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies

298Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults: Rapid review

258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How can HCI support end-of-life care? Critical perspectives on sociotechnical imaginaries for palliative care

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Video Calls as a Replacement for Family Visits During Lockdowns in Aged Care: Interview Study With Family Members

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Older Adults Imagining Future Technologies in Participatory Design Workshops: Supporting Continuity in the Pursuit of Meaningful Activities

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waycott, J., Zhao, W., Kelly, R. M., & Robertson, E. (2022). Technology-Mediated Enrichment in Aged Care: Survey and Interview Study. JMIR Aging, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/31162

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

53%

Researcher 9

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 10

43%

Social Sciences 6

26%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

17%

Computer Science 3

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0