Academics with Clay Feet? Anthropological Perspectives on Academic Freedom in Twenty-First Century African Universities

15Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Clay feet are heavy and disabling, sadly in the decolonial scholarly battlefield which otherwise requires all-weather feet suitable for ongoing battles. Drawing on autoethnographic experiences in some African universities and drawing on Melanesian cargo cults, this paper argues that to decolonise Africa, African academics should abate cargo cult mentalities which account for pathological and uncritical intellectual dependence on theories, ideas and models from elsewhere. Similarly, drawing on Melanesian bigmanism and drawing on how some academics seek to control how students and colleagues think and write, this paper contends that those that pose as bigmen and bigwomen in African universities are a serious threat to decolonial critical, creative, innovative and original thinking. Thus, populated with some high-ranking academics who, nonetheless, lack decolonial creativity, originality, innovativeness and critical thinking, African universities are – like in Melanesian bigmen societies – marked by patron-client relations within which students and colleagues are sadly corralled into epistemic clientelism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nhemachena, A., & Mawere, M. (2022). Academics with Clay Feet? Anthropological Perspectives on Academic Freedom in Twenty-First Century African Universities. Journal of African American Studies, 26(2), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-022-09584-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free